On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:00:42AM -0400, Tom St Denis wrote:
> We correctly grabbed the bits but did not shift them
> back to their correct place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
Tested-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
> ---
> src/lib/ring_decode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/ring_decode.c b/src/lib/ring_decode.c
> index 772ea49dda6f..c05fa632a233 100644
> --- a/src/lib/ring_decode.c
> +++ b/src/lib/ring_decode.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void print_decode_pm4_pkt3(struct umr_asic *asic, struct umr_ring_decoder
> case 0x33: // INDIRECT_BUFFER_CONST
> switch (decoder->pm4.cur_word) {
> case 0: printf("IB_BASE_LO: 0x%08lx, SWAP:%lu", BITS(ib, 2, 32), BITS(ib, 0, 2));
> - decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_lo = BITS(ib, 2, 32);
> + decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_lo = BITS(ib, 2, 32) << 2;
> break;
> case 1: printf("IB_BASE_HI: 0x%08lx", BITS(ib, 0, 16));
> decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_hi = BITS(ib, 0, 16);
> --
> 2.12.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
