Am 24.04.2017 um 10:38 schrieb Pan Bian: > From: Pan Bian <bianpan2016 at 163.com> > > Function radeon_ring_lock() returns an errno on failure, and its return > value should be validated. However, in functions r420_cp_errata_init() > and r420_cp_errata_fini(), its return value is not checked. This patch > adds the checks. > > Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016 at 163.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c > index 2828605..391c764 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static void r420_clock_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev) > > static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > { > + int r; > struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX]; > > /* RV410 and R420 can lock up if CP DMA to host memory happens > @@ -215,7 +216,8 @@ static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > * of the CP init, apparently. > */ > radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch); > - radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8); > + r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8); > + WARN_ON(r); > radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(R300_CP_RESYNC_ADDR, 1)); > radeon_ring_write(ring, rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch); > radeon_ring_write(ring, 0xDEADBEEF); > @@ -224,12 +226,14 @@ static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) > > static void r420_cp_errata_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev) > { > + int r; > struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX]; > > /* Catch the RESYNC we dispatched all the way back, > * at the very beginning of the CP init. > */ > - radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8); > + r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8); > + WARN_ON(r); > radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(R300_RB3D_DSTCACHE_CTLSTAT, 0)); > radeon_ring_write(ring, R300_RB3D_DC_FINISH); > radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ring, false);