On 17-04-08 04:50 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote: > On 07.04.2017 22:15, Felix Kuehling wrote: >> Change the wording of the CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_CIK option to indicate >> that it's no longer experimental. >> >> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig | 9 +++++---- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig >> index f3b6df8..029e3fe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig >> @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ config DRM_AMDGPU_CIK >> bool "Enable amdgpu support for CIK parts" >> depends on DRM_AMDGPU >> help >> - Choose this option if you want to enable experimental support >> - for CIK asics. >> + Choose this option if you want to enable support for CIK asics. >> >> - CIK is already supported in radeon. CIK support in amdgpu >> - is for experimentation and testing. >> + If you choose No here, CIK ASICs will be supported by the >> + radeon driver, as in previous kernel versions. Depending on >> + your choice you will need different user mode (Mesa, X.org) >> + drivers to support accelerated graphics on CIK. > > The last part is a bit misleading: while you do need different DDXes, > the same Mesa driver (radeonsi) will work with both the radeon and the > amdgpu kernel module for CIK. FWIW, the same is true for SI, although > older versions of Mesa might stumble when run on the amdgpu kernel > module. I see. Do you know the minimum Mesa version required for SI and CIK support on amdgpu respectively? Thanks, Felix > > Cheers, > Nicolai > > >> >> config DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR >> bool "Always enable userptr write support" >> > >
