> >>This code needs rewriting, not cleaning, not polishing, it needs to be >>split into its constituent parts, and reintegrated in a form more >>Linux process friendly. > > > Can we say "restructuring" just for consistency with Daniel's message (the > HW-dependent bits don't need to be rewritten but the way they are > used/called needs to change) ? Yes I think there is a lot of the code that could be reused with little change, it's just all the pieces tying it together needs restructure. Dave.
