[PATCH 09/12] drm/amd/display: fix indexing bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@xxxxxxx>

- is_new_pipe_surface should be addressed with pipe idx, not surface idx

Change-Id: I330c616c2ec91064dec2d32470c43f1abac21818
Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin at amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
index a3c5def507a9..70b7673993b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ void dc_update_surfaces_for_target(struct dc *dc, struct dc_surface_update *upda
 	struct core_dc *core_dc = DC_TO_CORE(dc);
 	struct validate_context *context = core_dc->temp_flip_context;
 	int i, j;
-	bool is_new_pipe_surface[MAX_SURFACES];
+	bool is_new_pipe_surface[MAX_PIPES];
 	const struct dc_surface *new_surfaces[MAX_SURFACES] = { 0 };
 
 	update_surface_trace(dc, updates, surface_count);
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ void dc_update_surfaces_for_target(struct dc *dc, struct dc_surface_update *upda
 				&context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[cur_pipe->bottom_pipe->pipe_idx];
 	}
 
-	for (j = 0; j < MAX_SURFACES; j++)
+	for (j = 0; j < MAX_PIPES; j++)
 		is_new_pipe_surface[j] = true;
 
 	for (i = 0 ; i < surface_count; i++) {
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ void dc_update_surfaces_for_target(struct dc *dc, struct dc_surface_update *upda
 			struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx = &context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[j];
 
 			if (surface == pipe_ctx->surface)
-				is_new_pipe_surface[i] = false;
+				is_new_pipe_surface[j] = false;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.9.3



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux