The attached patch allows my machine to boot also
Thanks
Mike
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 at 14:14 Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> Found the problem.
>
> amdgpu_atpx_pci_probe_handle is used to detect the ATPX handle, but this
> does not necessarily have to be on the dGPU. In fact, on your machine it
> is located on the Intel iGPU (00:02.0):
>
> [ 134.760509] vga_switcheroo: detected switching method
> \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.ATPX handle
>
> The parent device of the iGPU (00:00.0) is the root port which has no
> PCIe capability, hence bridge_d3 evaluated to false.
>
> Can you try the attached patch?
>
> Kind regards,
> Peter
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:49:08PM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > I can confirm the patch allows my machine to boot again
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 at 11:39 Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > To grab console output, you could also try to blacklist amdgpu at
> > > startup and load it later.
> > >
> > > Can you provide your acpidump (and lspci -nn, especially if you do not
> > > have a dmesg).
> > >
> > > This is the call chain:
> > >
> > > + amdgpu_atpx_detect
> > > + amdgpu_atpx_pci_probe_handle
> > > + return if ATPX ACPI handle cannot be found
> > > + set amdgpu_atpx_priv.bridge_pm_usable
> > > + amdgpu_atpx_init
> > > + amdgpu_atpx_validate
> > > + use amdgpu_atpx_priv.bridge_pm_usable
> > >
> > > I wonder whether newer devices remove ATPX completely. If that is the
> > > case (please provide acpidump!), can you try this hack:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > index 951addf..5c23382 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static bool amdgpu_atpx_pci_probe_handle(struct
> > > pci_dev *pdev)
> > > status = acpi_get_handle(dhandle, "ATPX", &atpx_handle);
> > > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > > amdgpu_atpx_priv.other_handle = dhandle;
> > > + amdgpu_atpx_priv.bridge_pm_usable = true;
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > > amdgpu_atpx_priv.dhandle = dhandle;
> > >
> > > This is not intended for merging, but just testing a hypothesis.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:20:28AM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > > He's some screen shots of the booting screens, apologies they're not
> that
> > > > clear
> > > >
> > > > https://imgur.com/a/V7mRA
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 at 11:00 Mike Lothian <mike at fireburn.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > The previous working kernel, was the patch before this - reverting
> > > fixes it
> > > > >
> > > > > My bios date is quite new 08/05/2016
> > > > >
> > > > > Most of the messages fly straight off the screen, the journal isn't
> > > kept
> > > > > and the wifi driver also complains, will see if I can get a slow
> motion
> > > > > capture of the errors and screen shot them
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 at 10:20 Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:36:27AM +0000, Mike Lothian wrote:
> > > > > > This patch is preventing my laptop from booting, I'm getting D3
> error
> > > > > > messages and atom bios stuck messages
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you post a dmesg and acpidump? What was the previous working
> > > kernel?
> > > > > I suppose your BIOS date (/sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date) is pre-2015?
> > > > > Does booting with runpm=0 work?
> > > > >
> > > > > > I mistakenly saw the v2 patch and didn't realise it was for
> radeon
> > > not
> > > > > > amdgpu - this branch and Linus's tree are currently not booting
> for
> > > me
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you mean by this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 at 17:16 Deucher, Alexander <
> > > > > Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Peter Wu [mailto:peter at lekensteyn.nl]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:13 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Alex Deucher
> > > > > > > > Cc: amd-gfx list; Deucher, Alexander; Nayan Deshmukh
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: fix power state when
> port
> > > pm is
> > > > > > > > unavailable
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:01:55PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Peter Wu <
> > > peter at lekensteyn.nl>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > When PCIe port PM is not enabled (system BIOS is
> pre-2015 or
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > pcie_port_pm=off parameter is set), legacy ATPX PM should
> > > still
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > marked as supported. Otherwise the GPU can fail to power
> on
> > > after
> > > > > > > > > > runtime suspend. This affected a Dell Inspiron 5548.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ideally the BIOS date in the PCI core is lowered to 2013
> (the
> > > > > first
> > > > > > > year
> > > > > > > > > > where hybrid graphics platforms using power resources was
> > > > > > > introduced),
> > > > > > > > > > but that seems more risky at this point and would not
> solve
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > pcie_port_pm=off issue.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bugzilla:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98505
> > > > > > > > > > Reported-and-tested-by: Nayan Deshmukh
> > > > > > > > <nayan26deshmukh at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This patch is already three weeks old. One alternative
> idea
> > > was
> > > > > > > lowering
> > > > > > > > BIOS
> > > > > > > > > > date in PCI core, but as pcie_port_pm=force did not have
> the
> > > > > desired
> > > > > > > > effect, I
> > > > > > > > > > do not think that this would help though.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for doing this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have also not contacted linux-pci or Mika about
> lowering
> > > the
> > > > > year
> > > > > > > due to
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > lack of a good reason. Might do it later though once
> ACPICA
> > > bug
> > > > > > > 1333 is
> > > > > > > > sorted
> > > > > > > > > > out such that lowering the year actually has benefits
> for a
> > > > > Nvidia
> > > > > > > laptop
> > > > > > > > (or if
> > > > > > > > > > some amdgpu problem can be solved by this).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Both patches should probably be Cc stable (4.8+), fixing
> > > > > > > 2f5af82eeab2 and
> > > > > > > > > > b8c9fd5ad4b4 ("track whether if this is a hybrid graphics
> > > > > > > platform"). There
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > been some ifdef 0's and reverts in between, so I was not
> > > sure if
> > > > > > > adding
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Fixes tag is appropriate.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't think we need to cc stable. In kernel 4.8 we don't
> > > > > attempt to
> > > > > > > > > do d3cold at all. 4.8 and older kernels have:
> > > > > > > > > c63695cc5e5f685e924e25a8f9555f6e846f1fc6 (drm/amdgpu: work
> > > around
> > > > > > > > lack
> > > > > > > > > of upstream ACPI support for D3cold)
> > > > > > > > > which was reverted for 4.9.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That patch was already reverted in 4.8 as far as I can see:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > $ git tag --contains
> c39b487f195b93235ee76384427467786f7bf29f |
> > > grep
> > > > > v4.8
> > > > > > > > v4.8
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you double-check? v4.8 was the first kernel with D3cold
> > > support
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > PCI core.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You are right. I was thinking d3cold went upstream in 4.9, so
> > > yes, we
> > > > > > > should apply this to 4.8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alex
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Series is:
> > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c | 9
> > > ++++++++-
> > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > > > > > > > > index 10b5ddf..951addf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct amdgpu_atpx {
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > static struct amdgpu_atpx_priv {
> > > > > > > > > > bool atpx_detected;
> > > > > > > > > > + bool bridge_pm_usable;
> > > > > > > > > > /* handle for device - and atpx */
> > > > > > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle;
> > > > > > > > > > acpi_handle other_handle;
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -200,7 +201,11 @@ static int
> amdgpu_atpx_validate(struct
> > > > > > > > amdgpu_atpx *atpx)
> > > > > > > > > > atpx->is_hybrid = false;
> > > > > > > > > > if (valid_bits & ATPX_MS_HYBRID_GFX_SUPPORTED) {
> > > > > > > > > > printk("ATPX Hybrid Graphics\n");
> > > > > > > > > > - atpx->functions.power_cntl = false;
> > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > + * Disable legacy PM methods only when
> pcie
> > > port
> > > > > PM
> > > > > > > is usable,
> > > > > > > > > > + * otherwise the device might fail to
> power
> > > off
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > power on.
> > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > + atpx->functions.power_cntl =
> > > > > > > > !amdgpu_atpx_priv.bridge_pm_usable;
> > > > > > > > > > atpx->is_hybrid = true;
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -471,6 +476,7 @@ static int
> amdgpu_atpx_power_state(enum
> > > > > > > > vga_switcheroo_client_id id,
> > > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > static bool amdgpu_atpx_pci_probe_handle(struct pci_dev
> > > *pdev)
> > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > + struct pci_dev *parent_pdev =
> > > pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> > > > > > > > > > acpi_handle dhandle, atpx_handle;
> > > > > > > > > > acpi_status status;
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -485,6 +491,7 @@ static bool
> > > > > > > > amdgpu_atpx_pci_probe_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > amdgpu_atpx_priv.dhandle = dhandle;
> > > > > > > > > > amdgpu_atpx_priv.atpx.handle = atpx_handle;
> > > > > > > > > > + amdgpu_atpx_priv.bridge_pm_usable = parent_pdev
> &&
> > > > > > > > parent_pdev->bridge_d3;
> > > > > > > > > > return true;
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > 2.10.2
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20161128/4342e913/attachment-0001.html>
