From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() should enable signaling even with a zero
timeout, but ttm_bo_wait() can also be called from atomic context and then it
is not a good idea to do this.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index f6ff579..d506361 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -1611,7 +1611,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unmap_virtual);
int ttm_bo_wait(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
bool interruptible, bool no_wait)
{
- long timeout = no_wait ? 0 : 15 * HZ;
+ long timeout = 15 * HZ;
+
+ if (no_wait) {
+ if (reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(bo->resv, true))
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
timeout = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->resv, true,
interruptible, timeout);
--
2.5.5
