HI all, On 2 November 2016 at 03:07, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: > > The first attached patch will result in drmParsePciDeviceInfo always > reporting revision 0 on kernels without the second attached patch. Will > that be an issue for the amdgpu-pro stack? > > Please follow up directly to the patch e-mails with any comments on the > patches. > Fleshing out the question from the actual patches: Do the AMDGPU-PRO or the AMD stack [as a whole] depend on the revision field as returned by the drmDevice API ? Since we have a lovely bug in libdrm and might roll out a release soonish it'll be great to have this squashed/merged as well. Thanks Emil
