While looking at dce_v8_0_afmt_setmode(), I was thinking how crammed it was and how unintuitive it looked. I compared it to its radeon counterpart and I realized how readable this last one was. I had a look at the other dce_vX_0_afmt_setmode() under amdgpu and they all look alike. Can somebody explain why the amdgpu's side just includes everything in dce_vX_0_afmt_setmode() instead of having a nicely structured and readable presentation as it is under radeon? I'm trying to structure the thing a bit more like the radeon's side for dce6, but their are some differences in the step order and even a few more registry read and write calls. Any clue will be welcomed. Cheers. -- Alexandre Demers
