Random short freezes due to TTM buffer migrations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sharing buffers between applications is handled by the DRM layer and 
transparent to the driver.

E.g. the driver is not even informed if a sharing is done by DMA-buf or 
GEM flink, it's just another reference to the BO.

So there isn't any change to that at all.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 17.08.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
> I think the scatter-gather tables only support system memory. As I
> understand it, a buffer in VRAM has be migrated to system memory before
> it can be shared with another driver.
>
> I'm more concerned about sharing with the same driver. There is a
> special code path for that, where we simply add another reference to the
> same BO, instead of looking at a scatter gather table. We use that for
> OpenGL-OpenCL interop, and also planning to use it for IPC buffer
> sharing in HSA. As long as a split VRAM buffer is still a single
> amdgpu_bo, and becomes a single dmabuf when exporting it, I think that
> should work.
>
> Regards,
>    Felix
>
>
> On 16-08-17 02:58 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> One question: Will it be possible to share these split BOs as dmabufs?
>> In theory yes, in practice I'm not sure.
>>
>> DMA-bufs are designed around scatter gather tables, those fortunately
>> support buffers split over the whole address space.
>>
>> The problem is the importing device needs to be able to handle that as
>> well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>> Am 16.08.2016 um 20:33 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
>>> Very nice. I'm looking forward to this for KFD as well.
>>>
>>> One question: Will it be possible to share these split BOs as dmabufs?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>     Felix
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16-08-16 11:27 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>> I'm already working on this.
>>>>
>>>> My current approach is to use a custom BO manager for VRAM with TTM
>>>> and so split allocations into chunks of 4MB.
>>>>
>>>> Large BOs are still swapped out as one, but it makes it much more
>>>> likely to that you can allocate 1/2 of VRAM as one buffer.
>>>>
>>>> Give me till the end of the week to finish this and then we can test
>>>> if that's sufficient or if we need to do more.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>> Am 16.08.2016 um 16:33 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing random temporary freezes (up to 2 seconds) under memory
>>>>> pressure. Before I describe the exact circumstances, I'd like to say
>>>>> that this is a serious issue affecting playability of certain AAA
>>>>> Linux games.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to reproduce this, an application should:
>>>>> - allocate a few very large buffers (256-512 MB per buffer)
>>>>> - allocate more memory than there is available VRAM. The issue also
>>>>> occurs (but at a lower frequency) if the app needs only 80% of VRAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Example: ttm_bo_validate needs to migrate a 512 MB buffer. The total
>>>>> size of moved memory for that call can be as high as 1.5 GB. This is
>>>>> always followed by a big temporary drop in VRAM usage.
>>>>>
>>>>> The game I'm testing needs 3.4 GB of VRAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Setups:
>>>>> Tonga - 2 GB: It's nearly unplayable, because freezes occur too often.
>>>>> Fiji - 4 GB: There is one freeze at the beginning (which is annoying
>>>>> too), after that it's smooth.
>>>>>
>>>>> So even 4 GB is not enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> Workarounds:
>>>>> - Split buffers into smaller pieces in the kernel. It's not necessary
>>>>> to manage memory at page granularity (64KB). Splitting buffers into
>>>>> 16MB-large pieces might not be optimal but it would be a significant
>>>>> improvement.
>>>>> - Or do the same in Mesa. This would prevent inter-process and
>>>>> inter-API buffer sharing for split buffers (DRI, OpenCL), but we would
>>>>> at least verify how much the situation improves.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other issues sharing the same cause:
>>>>> - Allocations requesting 1/3 or more VRAM have a high chance of
>>>>> failing. It's generally not possible to allocate 1/2 or more VRAM as
>>>>> one buffer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments welcome,
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux