Am 26.07.2016 um 09:40 schrieb zhoucm1: > > On 2016å¹´07æ??26æ?¥ 15:32, Christian König wrote: >> Ok, I really wasn't expecting this. How about 100ms? > I tried it just now, 100ms isn't enough as well, see the append log. > >> >> I just want to avoid that a reset takes more than 1 or 2 seconds even >> when it didn't worked. >> >> With 1 second timeout for each IB test we easily need 10+ seconds >> when the hardware doesn't response at all. > This isn't true, when anyone of them timeout happens, > amdgpu_ib_ring_tests will return error. Ah! Of course we abort after the first failed test. In this case feel free to add my Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> to the original patch. Regards, Christian. > > [ 59.286927] [drm:amdgpu_job_timedout [amdgpu]] *ERROR* ring gfx > timeout, last signaled seq=30397, last emitted seq=30399 > [ 59.287253] [drm] IP block:1 is hang! > [ 59.287262] [drm] IP block:5 is hang! > [ 59.288375] [drm] Some block need full reset! > [ 59.288385] pp_set_clockgating_state was not implemented. > [ 59.343335] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU pci config reset > [ 59.422762] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume > [ 59.423971] [drm] PCIE GART of 4096M enabled (table at > 0x0000000000040000). > [ 59.433374] current thermal is out of range > [ 59.436736] [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 14 usecs > [ 59.437341] [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 27 usecs > [ 59.437388] [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 23 usecs > [ 59.437399] [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 5 usecs > [ 59.437405] [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.437412] [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.437420] [drm] ring test on 6 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.437429] [drm] ring test on 7 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.437435] [drm] ring test on 8 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.437493] [drm] ring test on 9 succeeded in 6 usecs > [ 59.437501] [drm] ring test on 10 succeeded in 6 usecs > [ 59.464320] [drm] ring test on 11 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.464322] [drm] UVD initialized successfully. > [ 59.564307] [drm] ring test on 12 succeeded in 14 usecs > [ 59.564316] [drm] ring test on 13 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.564317] [drm] VCE initialized successfully. > [ 59.662835] [drm:gfx_v8_0_ring_test_ib [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu: IB > test timed out. > [ 59.663030] [drm:amdgpu_ib_ring_tests [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu: > failed testing IB on GFX ring (-110). > [ 59.663227] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: ib ring test failed (-110). > [ 59.663349] pp_set_clockgating_state was not implemented. > [ 59.749358] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU pci config reset > [ 59.830784] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume > [ 59.831982] [drm] PCIE GART of 4096M enabled (table at > 0x0000000000040000). > [ 59.841412] current thermal is out of range > [ 59.844763] [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 14 usecs > [ 59.845341] [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 27 usecs > [ 59.845385] [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 21 usecs > [ 59.845397] [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 5 usecs > [ 59.845406] [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.845412] [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.845421] [drm] ring test on 6 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.845429] [drm] ring test on 7 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.845435] [drm] ring test on 8 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.845493] [drm] ring test on 9 succeeded in 6 usecs > [ 59.845500] [drm] ring test on 10 succeeded in 6 usecs > [ 59.872362] [drm] ring test on 11 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 59.872363] [drm] UVD initialized successfully. > root at zhoucm1-System-Product-Name:~# dmesg -c > [ 59.971707] [drm] ring test on 12 succeeded in 14 usecs > [ 59.971717] [drm] ring test on 13 succeeded in 3 usecs > [ 59.971717] [drm] VCE initialized successfully. > [ 60.070820] [drm:gfx_v8_0_ring_test_ib [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu: IB > test timed out. > [ 60.071051] [drm:amdgpu_ib_ring_tests [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu: > failed testing IB on GFX ring (-110). > [ 60.071252] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: ib ring test failed (-110). > [ 60.071375] pp_set_clockgating_state was not implemented. > [ 60.151397] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU pci config reset > [ 60.230844] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume > [ 60.232044] [drm] PCIE GART of 4096M enabled (table at > 0x0000000000040000). > [ 60.241412] current thermal is out of range > [ 60.244746] [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 13 usecs > [ 60.245322] [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 27 usecs > [ 60.245368] [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 23 usecs > [ 60.245380] [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 5 usecs > [ 60.245386] [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 60.245393] [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs > [ 60.245402] [drm] ring test on 6 succeeded in 3 usecs > >> >> Regards, >> Christian. >> >> Am 26.07.2016 um 09:28 schrieb zhoucm1: >>> CQE has found timeout when they cherry-pick your timeout patch. >>> I also found ib_test could be timeout after gpu reset. >>> 1s maybe too long for a simple testing command, but I just think >>> that doesn't matter to judge timeout. >>> >>> Regards, >>> David >>> >>> On 2016å¹´07æ??26æ?¥ 15:24, Christian König wrote: >>>> Am 26.07.2016 um 07:57 schrieb Chunming Zhou: >>>>> we should give enough time to IB test. >>>>> >>>>> Change-Id: I92bfbe9b3aa35083f41baed8663907abfa15c8e6 >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou at amd.com> >>>> >>>> Do we really need more than 10ms for an IB test? A whole second >>>> sounds awful long when we need to do 10+ tests currently. >>>> >>>> Christian. >>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c >>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c >>>>> index 050062e..a31d7ef 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c >>>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ >>>>> #include "amdgpu.h" >>>>> #include "atom.h" >>>>> -#define AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(10) >>>>> +#define AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(1000) >>>>> /* >>>>> * IB >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20160726/776fcf72/attachment.html>