On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 05:36:39PM +0800, Christian König wrote: > Am 28.06.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Huang Rui: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:04:18PM +0800, Chunming Zhou wrote: > >> ring_mirror_list is only used kthread context, no need to spinlock. > >> otherwise deadlock happens when kthread_park. > >> > > Yes, in process context, we prefer to use mutex, because it avoids to > > grab the CPU all the time. > > > > Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com> > > NAK, the patch won't apply because I've changed the irq save spin lock > to a normal one quite a while ago. But, I'm not sure if Alex picked up > that patch yet. > > You shouldn't use a mutex here when you don't have a reason to do so. > Spin locks have less overhead and we won't expect any contention here. > If the CPU core numbers are large, spinlock will grab the cpu and might cause some potential deaklock or busy waiting. I think it should be use mutex if it is not in interrupt context. Thanks, Rui