Hi Dave, Bug reports concerning released pro-stack components should be fine and we can serve as an interface to raise them internally (e.g. bug tracking). Schedules/roadmaps/etc are things we're really sensitive about (along with the usual corporate day-to-day chatter which is private). Tom ________________________________ From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 20:09 To: aelaric Cc: amd-gfx mailing list Subject: Re: [amd-gfx] Amdgpu-pro On 20 June 2016 at 02:24, aelaric <aelaric at inbox.com> wrote: > Is this list limited to discussions concerning the amdgpu open source driver > or does it also include discussions about amdgpu-pro hybrid driver as well? > > --aelaric > I think initially it might be preferred to not spend too much time on this list on amdgpu-pro, just because I know from experience on the Internet it will just turn into a list where people ask questions that nobody can or is able to answer. It's really up to Alex and other AMDers but it might be more comfortable transition if we limit this list to just talking about completely open source components so as to avoid any IP issues. Dave. _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20160620/74bcfb2a/attachment-0001.html>
