On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:39:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:48 PM Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:41:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > To avoid a dependency on the pxa platform header files with > > > hardcoded registers, change the driver to call a wrapper > > > in the pxa2xx-ac97-lib that encapsulates all the other > > > ac97 stuff. > > > > Not supper happy about adding module dependencies. Can we include > > mach/regs-ac97.h from include/sound/pxa2xx-lib.h and use static inlines? > > Someone needs to include mach/regs-ac97.h in the end... > > > > Or there is something later in the series that needs it? > > One of the goals of the series is to completely remove all mach/*.h headers > and place them somewhere else, ideally inaccessible to device drivers. > > In case of mach/regs-ac97.h, the later patch "ASoC: pxa: ac97: use normal > MMIO accessors" passes the physical register base address as a platform > device resource that gets ioremapped in the ac97 driver, rather than > hardcoding the virtual address in a global header. > > I agree that the exported function is still ugly, but I hope it's enough of > an improvement over the previous state that we can do it anyway. > > If you have any better ideas though, I can give that a try, too. > One possibility would be a higher-level interface exported on top > of 'struct snd_ac97', but I could not figure out how to do this. No, I do mot really have better ideas given your stated goals and I guess there is not really much benefit on spending too much effort polishing essentially one driver. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
