On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:34 AM kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Tzung-Bi, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on asoc/for-next] > [cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the > base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tzung-Bi-Shih/ASoC-mediatek-mt8183-mt6358-ts3a227-max98357-support-WoV/20191014-183227 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next > config: x86_64-randconfig-g002-201941 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=x86_64 > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c: In function 'cros_ec_codec_platform_probe': > >> sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c:993:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_read_number'; did you mean 'wov_read_audio'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > priv->ec_shm_addr = of_read_number(regaddr_p, 2); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > wov_read_audio > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors The error is caused by EC_CODEC=y but CONFIG_OF is not set: $ grep -e 'CONFIG_OF.*' -e 'EC_CODEC' config # CONFIG_OF is not set CONFIG_SND_SOC_CROS_EC_CODEC=y > > vim +993 sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c > > 973 > 974 static int cros_ec_codec_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > 975 { > 976 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > 977 struct cros_ec_device *ec_device = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > 978 struct cros_ec_codec_priv *priv; > 979 struct device_node *node; > 980 struct resource res; > 981 struct ec_param_ec_codec p; > 982 struct ec_response_ec_codec_get_capabilities r; > 983 int ret; > 984 u64 ec_shm_size; > 985 const __be32 *regaddr_p; > 986 > 987 priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > 988 if (!priv) > 989 return -ENOMEM; > 990 > 991 regaddr_p = of_get_address(dev->of_node, 0, &ec_shm_size, NULL); > 992 if (regaddr_p) { > > 993 priv->ec_shm_addr = of_read_number(regaddr_p, 2); In the case, the of_get_address( ) will get a dummy implementation (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3.6/source/include/linux/of_address.h#L82) while of_read_number( ) won't (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3.6/source/include/linux/of.h#L234). Rob, what do you think if we add a dummy implementation for of_read_number( ) if !CONFIG_OF (i.e. after https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3.6/source/include/linux/of.h#L559)? Does it make sense? > 994 priv->ec_shm_len = ec_shm_size; > 995 > 996 dev_dbg(dev, "ec_shm_addr=%#llx len=%#x\n", > 997 priv->ec_shm_addr, priv->ec_shm_len); > 998 } > 999 > 1000 node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0); > 1001 if (node) { > 1002 ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res); > 1003 if (!ret) { > 1004 priv->ap_shm_phys_addr = res.start; > 1005 priv->ap_shm_len = resource_size(&res); > 1006 priv->ap_shm_addr = > 1007 (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)devm_ioremap_wc( > 1008 dev, priv->ap_shm_phys_addr, > 1009 priv->ap_shm_len); > 1010 priv->ap_shm_last_alloc = priv->ap_shm_phys_addr; > 1011 > 1012 dev_dbg(dev, "ap_shm_phys_addr=%#llx len=%#x\n", > 1013 priv->ap_shm_phys_addr, priv->ap_shm_len); > 1014 } > 1015 } > 1016 > 1017 priv->dev = dev; > 1018 priv->ec_device = ec_device; > 1019 atomic_set(&priv->dmic_probed, 0); > 1020 > 1021 p.cmd = EC_CODEC_GET_CAPABILITIES; > 1022 ret = send_ec_host_command(priv->ec_device, EC_CMD_EC_CODEC, > 1023 (uint8_t *)&p, sizeof(p), > 1024 (uint8_t *)&r, sizeof(r)); > 1025 if (ret) { > 1026 dev_err(dev, "failed to EC_CODEC_GET_CAPABILITIES\n"); > 1027 return ret; > 1028 } > 1029 priv->ec_capabilities = r.capabilities; > 1030 > 1031 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv); > 1032 > 1033 ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(dev, &i2s_rx_component_driver, > 1034 &i2s_rx_dai_driver, 1); > 1035 if (ret) > 1036 return ret; > 1037 > 1038 return devm_snd_soc_register_component(dev, &wov_component_driver, > 1039 &wov_dai_driver, 1); > 1040 } > 1041 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
