Hi Mark These are v2 of soc-core cleanup. These are related to topology, but according to Intel CI, there is no damage to it. Some of them need more review. I added some mark to such patch. I merged posted-but-not-yet-accepted patch on top of it. Kuninori Morimoto (22): ASoC: soc-pcm: fixup dpcm_prune_paths() loop continue ASoC: soc-core: remove for_each_rtdcom_safe() ASoC: soc-core: add for_each_rtd_components() and replace ASoC: soc-core: snd_soc_unbind_card() cleanup ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded snd_soc_tplg_component_remove() ASoC: soc-core: move soc_init_dai_link() ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link() ASoC: soc-core: remove duplicated soc_is_dai_link_bound() ASoC: soc-core: call soc_bind_dai_link() under snd_soc_add_dai_link() ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link() ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_lookup_component() ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() ASoC: soc-core: remove snd_soc_component_add/del() ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component() ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_register_dai() ASoC: soc-core: move snd_soc_unregister_dais() ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_unregister_dai() ASoC: soc-core: have legacy_dai_naming at snd_soc_register_dai() ASoC: soc-core: don't call snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets() at snd_soc_register_dai() ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais() ASoC: soc-core: remove topology specific operation ASoC: soc.h: dobj is used only when SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY include/sound/soc.h | 25 ++- sound/soc/soc-component.c | 43 +--- sound/soc/soc-compress.c | 52 ++--- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 561 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 55 ++--- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 17 +- 6 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 431 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
