Hi Pierre-Louis
Thank you for your feedback
> > snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology.
> > But, to reduce duplicated code, it will be used from soc-core, too.
> > To prepare for it, this patch adds missing parameter legacy_dai_naming
> > to snd_soc_register_dai().
>
> It doesn't look like this series reduces the confusion between
> snd_soc_register_dai() and snd_soc_register_dais() ?
>
> maybe for the latter case since it's a static function we don't want
> the entire prefix then?
Maybe my explain is not so good...
The point is that, in general people think like below from naming.
Other functions are this style.
=> int snd_soc_register_dai()
{
...
}
int snd_soc_register_dais()
{
for(..) {
=> snd_soc_register_dai()
}
}
But in reality is like this
int snd_soc_register_dai()
{
/* almost same but different code */
}
snd_soc_register_dais()
{
/* almost same but different code */
}
To avoid duplicate code and confusion,
this patchset try to implement "general" style.
But needs some preparation.
I will fix log and English.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
