On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 4:27 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma.o
> > +# pdc and dma need to both be built-in if any user of
> > +# ssc is built-in.
> > +ifdef CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-pdc.o
> > +endif
> > +ifdef CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC) += snd-soc-atmel-pcm-dma.o
> > +endif
>
> Doesn't that prevent them to be built as a module at all?
> I'm not sure there is a use case though.
It should not: the idea was that snd-soc-atmel-pcm-{pdc,dma}.o
get built as modules if CONFIG_SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC=m.
arnd
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
