Unrelated to this specific patch, but I looked at _sdw_disable_stream()
and I see this there (again, maybe my version is outdated already):
struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt = NULL;
struct sdw_bus *bus = NULL;
where both those initialisations are redundant. Moreover:
will look at this, thanks.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:40:15PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
When we disable the stream and then call hw_free, two bank switches
will be handled and as a result we re-enable the stream on hw_free.
Make sure the stream is disabled on both banks.
TODO: we need to completely revisit all this and make sure we have a
mirroring mechanism between current and alternate banks.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
index 53f5e790fcd7..75b9ad1fb1a6 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
@@ -1637,7 +1637,24 @@ static int _sdw_disable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
}
}
- return do_bank_switch(stream);
+ ret = do_bank_switch(stream);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Bank switch failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* make sure alternate bank (previous current) is also disabled */
+ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
+ bus = m_rt->bus;
"bus" is only used below, so at least take that line under "if (ret < 0)"
or even just do "dev_err(m_rt->bus->dev,...)" everywhere in this function
and remove the variable altogether...
will look at this, thanks Guennadi
Thanks
Guennadi
+ /* Disable port(s) */
+ ret = sdw_enable_disable_ports(m_rt, false);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(bus->dev, "Disable port(s) failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
