On 7/22/19 7:26 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:14:28 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 7/22/19 3:54 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 23:06:46 +0200,
Cezary Rojewski wrote:
--- a/sound/hda/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/hda/Kconfig
@@ -29,3 +29,6 @@ config SND_HDA_PREALLOC_SIZE
Note that the pre-allocation size can be changed dynamically
via a proc file (/proc/asound/card*/pcm*/sub*/prealloc), too.
+
+config SND_INTEL_NHLT
+ tristate
If above is true, "depends on ACPI" would be expected.
This won't fix things in practice as the Kconfig reverse selection
ignores the dependencies of the selected item. It'd be as a help for
readers, though.
There is a fallback if ACPI is not defined, so the code would always
compile. Configurations which select SND_INTEL_NHLT already depend on
ACPI.
IIUC, the question above came from the point:
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_INTEL_NHLT)
....
#else
....
#endif
and here Cezary suggested to drop IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) *iff* the
dependency can be assured in Kconfig side. But for that assurance,
putting "depends on ACPI" in config SND_INTEL_NHLT block won't
suffice; that was my followup.
So, as of the current code, we can drop IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) from
the ifdef above, yes. But the dependency is no rock solid at this
point, so either some comments or keeping the extra ifdef like the
above would be needed, IMO.
this extra ifdef is a bit overkill, I added it to make sure that the
fallbacks are used in nonsensical configurations w/ randconfig. In
practice, all Intel drivers already depend on ACPI and for the legacy we
already have:
select SND_INTEL_NHLT if ACPI
Not sure if we need to do anything more.
thanks,
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
