From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/tegra/tegra_max98090.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_max98090.c b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_max98090.c
index 4786baa..4954a33 100644
--- a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_max98090.c
+++ b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_max98090.c
@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ static int tegra_max98090_asoc_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(pcm,
DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_EMPTY()),
- DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC(NULL, "HiFi")));
+ DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC(NULL, "HiFi")),
+ DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_EMPTY()));
static struct snd_soc_dai_link tegra_max98090_dai = {
.name = "max98090",
@@ -241,6 +242,8 @@ static int tegra_max98090_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
+ tegra_max98090_dai.platforms->of_node = tegra_max98090_dai.cpus->of_node;
+
ret = tegra_asoc_utils_init(&machine->util_data, &pdev->dev);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
