On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:34:47AM +0000, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 16:15 +1000, Matt Flax wrote: > > Is there a reason to keep these two related driver functions separate > > ? > cs42xxx codec has also an SPI interface. If anyone wants to implement > support for that it would be easier with the current split. Right, that's the reason for the split - the split would need to be redone if anyone wants to add SPI support.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
