On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 10:08:44AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:00 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > The advantage of mutexes is that they are very simple and clear to > > reason about. It is therefore unclear that this conversion to use > > atomic variables is an improvement, they're generally more complex > > to reason about and fragile. > The point of this patch is not to remove the mutex in favor of atomic > operations Sure, but you mixed in a conversion to atomic operations as well. > I can put back mutex to protect the flag if you prefer. > Another solution would be to use the mutex as the 'busy' flag. > Get the ownership of the hdmi using try_lock() in startup() and > release it in shutdown() > Would you have a preference Mark ? Probably using a mutex for the flag is clearer. I'd rather keep things as simple as absolutely possible to avoid people making mistakes in future.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
