Re: [PATCH v4 02/22] soundwire: fix SPDX license for header files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:46:49AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 01-05-19, 10:57, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > No C++ comments in .h files
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soundwire/bus.h            | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/soundwire/intel.h          | 4 ++--
> 
> As I said previously this touches subsystem header as well as driver
> headers which is not ideal.

What?  Who knows that?  Who cares?

This is doing "one logical thing" to all of the needed files.  Your
split of "this is a driver" vs. "this is a subsystem" split is _VERY_
arbritary.

That's just too picky and assumes a subsystem-internal-knowledge much
deeper than anyone submitting a normal cleanup patch would ever know.

I think you have swung too far to the "too picky" side, you might want
to dial it back.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux