On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:11:50 +0200, Phil Burk wrote: > > Hello Takashi, > > Sorry for the late reply. I got pulled off on some other projects. > > We will try to test this in-house but we will need Qualcomm's help. > I will also try to get some of our SOC partners to help with testing. OK. > > If we miss it, it'll be postponed at least for 5.3, > > i.e. more three months. > > I think it will be difficult to complete the testing before that 5.2 deadline. > We should probably shoot for 5.3. If someone needs it sooner that they will > have the patches. Fair enough, let's postpone the merge, then. > Thanks again for all this work. > > I assume the four emails below have all the latest patches needed for rev 6. I believe yes. Thanks for the quick update! Takashi > Thanks, > Phil Burk > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:08 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:41:11 +0100, > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > Dne 26. 03. 19 v 15:27 Phil Burk napsal(a): > > > Hello, > > > > > > Thanks for keeping this moving forward. > > > > > > Any suggestions for testing this? We can try to test it here in > Android. It may be tricky because your patches may conflict with some > proprietary Qualcomm changes in the kernel we are currently using. > > > > > > Can I get a summary list of the patches required for kernel and > tinyalsa? > > > > The v6 is the last version, the full information is in the cover letter: > > > > > https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-February/145127.html > > > https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-February/145128.html > > > https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-February/145129.html > > > https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-February/145130.html > > Is there any test result from the practical use cases? > > Basically now is the last chance for merging such an intrusive change > for 5.2 kernel. If we miss it, it'll be postponed at least for 5.3, > i.e. more three months. > > thanks, > > Takashi > > > > > Jaroslav > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Phil Burk > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:13 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx <mailto: > tiwai@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:09:28 +0100, > > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:39:08AM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > This patchset contains the anonymous dup implementation with > permissions > > > > > checking for the ALSA's PCM interface in kernel to enable the > restricted > > > > > DMA sound buffer sharing for the restricted tasks. > > > > > > > > Is there any news on merging this during the current development > cycle, > > > > or anything else needed to move this forwards? > > > > > > I've seen no reaction whether the patch really tested, worked or > > > helped in the real scenario... > > > > > > > > > Takashi > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> > > Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. > > > > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
