Hi > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote: > > > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example > 12kHz/24kHz > > > we > > > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more > > > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which > > > > is not flexible. > > > > > > > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which > > > > can give the pre-processing and post-processing options according > > > > to the sample rate. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > A couple of more small comments. > > > > > > And please add this when you resend: > > > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin > > > > > > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop > > > this line - > > > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these > > > unsupported cases. > > > > I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a > reminder. > > Okay. Let's use something more practical like: > > +* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the > function: > +* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate > +* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate Ok. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
