On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:18:22PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig > >>>> index 19c8efb9a5ee..84876a74874f 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig > >>>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig > >>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > >>>> > >>>> menuconfig SOUNDWIRE > >>>> bool "SoundWire support" > >>>> - ---help--- > >>>> + help > >>> > >>> Not sure if this is a style issue, kernel seems to have 2990 instances > >>> of this! > >> > >> this is reported by checkpatch.pl --strict. > > > > Please don't run checkpatch on code that's already in the kernel, and > > especially not with the --strict (a.k.a. --subjective) option enabled. > > > > Don't try to fix what isn't broken. > > I would agree in general, but this case is different: the SoundWire code > in the upstream kernel is missing parts left and right and isn't fully > functional as is. I will soon be posting what's missing, so this cleanup > is an opportunity to bring SoundWire to the latest coding standards > before adding the missing pieces which will be compliant with --strict. > For the record using --strict already exposed 3 major issues in the > yet-to-be-released code, so it's not as subjective as you describe it. It's not just me calling it subjective; --subjective is literally another name for the same switch which enables checks that are specifically *not* part of the coding standard. By all my means use it on your own patches before you submit them if you agree with all or some of those checks, but I doubt all that open-parenthesis re-alignment is going to expose any major issues. ;) It does add noise, and makes code forensic and backports harder though. Johan _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
