Re: 'modern dailink' transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Morimoto-san,
I want to ask you about "Multi CPU" support.
When you can post it ?
I'm asking because I'm waiting it for a long term,
and "switch to modern style" is based on it.
But, v3 is not yet posted, right ?

the multi-cpu part is required for SoundWire, but the directions taken to support multi-cpu are changing due to additional developments in the MIPI Software WG (contributors only at this point). So the plan for now is to develop with single cpu-dai first, and add multi-cpu support at a later stage.

In other words, the multi-cpu/multi-link part isn't the most urgent priority and it shouldn't impact your work.


If you can post it soon, I can keep waiting.
But, if it will takes more long term, can I suggest ?
I think there is few conflict around soc.h and soc-core.c
between this suggestion and your patch, but not super much.

	1. I will post "modern style CPU" support,
	   it is still "single CPU"
	2. All sound card switch to "modern style"
	3. remove "legacy style"

I think, your "Multi CPU" support can be implemented
on top of it.

yes that's fine, this plan works fine for me.

And, I can continue, like this

	4. post "allow no Platfrom"
	5. remove "snd-soc-dummy Platfrom",
	   and "CPU = Platfrom" code from Intel card
	   as trial. If it was OK, continue for all card.

there are only 2 or 3 cases of this snd-soc-dummy platform and I'll try to remove it as part of the first batch. I don't think it's necessary at all.

Thanks!

-Pierre

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux