Re: [Sound-open-firmware] [PATCH v5 09/14] ASoC: SOF: Add firmware loader support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




+static int get_ext_windows(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
+			   struct sof_ipc_ext_data_hdr *ext_hdr)
+{
+	struct sof_ipc_window *w = (struct sof_ipc_window *)ext_hdr;

In general it's safer to use container_of() than the forced cast, and...

yes


+/* parse the extended FW boot data structures from FW boot message */
+int snd_sof_fw_parse_ext_data(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar, u32 offset)
+{
+	struct sof_ipc_ext_data_hdr *ext_hdr;
+	void *ext_data;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ext_data = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ext_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/* get first header */
+	snd_sof_dsp_block_read(sdev, bar, offset, ext_data,
+			       sizeof(*ext_hdr));
+	ext_hdr = (struct sof_ipc_ext_data_hdr *)ext_data;

The cast isn't needed from a void pointer.  The whole SOF codes have
way too many unneeded cast.  Let's reduce.

ok. we've removed quite a few casts but that's obviously not finished.


+/* generic module parser for mmaped DSPs */
+int snd_sof_parse_module_memcpy(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
+				struct snd_sof_mod_hdr *module)
+{
+	struct snd_sof_blk_hdr *block;
+	int count;
+	u32 offset;
+	size_t remaining;
+
+	dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "new module size 0x%x blocks 0x%x type 0x%x\n",
+		module->size, module->num_blocks, module->type);
+
+	block = (struct snd_sof_blk_hdr *)((u8 *)module + sizeof(*module));
+
+	/* module->size doesn't include header size */
+	remaining = module->size;
+	for (count = 0; count < module->num_blocks; count++) {
+		/* minus header size of block */
+		remaining -= sizeof(*block);
+		if (remaining < block->size) {
+			dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: not enough data remaining\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}

remaining is unsigned, so a negative check doesn't work here.
Hence you need the explicit underflow check.

yes, probably need ssize_t here.


+static int load_modules(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+	struct snd_sof_fw_header *header;
+	struct snd_sof_mod_hdr *module;
+	int (*load_module)(struct snd_sof_dev *sof_dev,
+			   struct snd_sof_mod_hdr *hdr);
+	int ret, count;
+	size_t remaining;
+
+	header = (struct snd_sof_fw_header *)fw->data;
+	load_module = sof_ops(sdev)->load_module;
+	if (!load_module)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* parse each module */
+	module = (struct snd_sof_mod_hdr *)((u8 *)(fw->data) + sizeof(*header));
+	remaining = fw->size - sizeof(*header);

The size check should be more strict (e.g. here remaining might become
negative).

yes.


+int snd_sof_load_firmware_raw(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
+{
+	struct snd_sof_pdata *plat_data = sdev->pdata;
+	const char *fw_filename;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* set code loading condition to true */
+	sdev->code_loading = 1;
+
+	/* Don't request firmware again if firmware is already requested */
+	if (plat_data->fw)
+		return 0;
+
+	fw_filename = devm_kasprintf(sdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
+				     "%s/%s",
+				     plat_data->fw_filename_prefix,
+				     plat_data->fw_filename);
+	if (!fw_filename)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = request_firmware(&plat_data->fw, fw_filename, sdev->dev);
+
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: request firmware %s failed err: %d\n",
+			fw_filename, ret);
+	}
+	return ret;

Hrm, any need of devm_kasprintf() here?  That is, do we need to keep
this string after the call of request_firmware()?  It doesn't make
sense if we need it only temporarily.

Good point, this can be simplified.

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux