On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > I agree. We can have just two modes for the beginning: > a) full one (useful for testing) > b) buffer only (allow just sound data mmap) > The question, if we should use different names (line anon_inode:snd-pcm > and anon_inode:snd-pcm-buffer) for the anonymous inodes remains. I > believe it might be good to distinguish this to allow the proper SELinux > audit. I agree that the separte names seems better, it gives more flexibility and control to people writing policies.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
