Hi Pierre Thank you for your feedback > > These add snd_soc_dai_link_component support for CPU. > > I know multi-CPU support patch was posted to ML, > > but I think it is not yet accepted (or rejected ?). > If you are referring to the Intel patches, they were really too > intrusive and complicated. Quite frankly I don't think anyone at Intel > (me included) understands what is "legacy" and what is "modern", so > adding multiple cpu support in there was really guesswork and > copy/replace of the multi-codec parts, likely to break and impossible > to test. Sorry, what does your "Intel patches" means ? Do you mean like this ? Subject: [PATCH v6 0/3] ASoC: Add Multi CPU DAI support Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:24:14 +0530 If so, actually I'm very waiting this patch series. But, it seems nothing happen on ALSA ML after that. So, I thought it was rejected or something happen. I think my patch and above are basically using same idea for dai_link, I think there is no conflict around dai_link. If above patch series was delayed or temporary aborted, and will be restart/retry multi CPU support someday, then, it can based on it, I thought. If Intel still have plan about it, I'm very happy to wait. > If you have a blurb or description of the end-goal and what evolutions > are required for dai links, it'd be really nice. Following incremental > patches over multiple kernel versions isn't straightforward and the > impacts of your changes isn't clear to me, e.g. I'd really like to > know if the current way Intel uses dailinks needs to be changed or if > we are good. Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
