On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:41:38PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:16:57PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > Maybe the defer card probe logic needs to be extended to also check if > > > dai_link_name had already been registered (either cpu or cpu_dai_name > > > needs to be set), not 100% sure which problem the defer card probe patch > > > was trying to solve. > > We were getting cards probing without the platforms being registered > (which in turn meant we were just skipping their init) and had patches > proposed to implement the deferral in the cards. The deferral stuff is > supposed to making sure that everything is registered when we > instantiate. Ah, that makes sense. Thanks a lot for the info! so long, Hias > > > same here, I don't get why the deferred probe stuff only deals with one of > > the two options. > > I think it's just an oversight - I think the change you were proposing > to check the cpu_dai_name is a good idea anyway as it makes things more > consistent and work more obviously by intention. And more generally if > we can simplify the code by removing legacy options that'd be good but > that's a bigger bit of work... _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
