On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:10:53PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 1/9/19 1:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > This thread appears to have died without a conclusion I can see? I > > don't have strong feelings here, it seems like it's a choice between > > different evils so people working on the platform should make the call. > this was fixed by the v2 patch applied on January 4? > Applied "ASoC: Intel: sst: Fallback to BYT-CR if IRQ 5 is > missing" to the asoc tree That's entirely possible, the subject line did change so I didn't immediately notice it was the same quirk.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
