On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:15 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> > satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> > specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
> > on PCI. For this reason, add a direct dependency on CONFIG_PCI to the
> > IOSF_MBI driver.
> >
> > Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sinan, I thought you received an ACK from Pierre-Louis on this one, didn't you?
>
Yes, there was an ack assuming that I fixed the ia64 kconfig. Since I
didn't, I took it back.
Later ia64 failure was fixed by another patchset and Pierre-Louis said
"looks good to me". I didn't
assume it was an ack unless explicitly stated.
It might be good if Pierre-Louis acked this version instead.
> > ---
> > sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> > index 99a62ba409df..bd9fd2035c55 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_PCI
> > config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI
> > tristate "ACPI HiFi2 (Baytrail, Cherrytrail) Platforms"
> > default ACPI
> > - depends on X86 && ACPI
> > + depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI
> > select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
> > select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM
> > select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
> > --
>
> Mark, assuming that the ACK above was given here, do you want me to
> take this patch or do you want to take care of it yourself?
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
