On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch. > > > > arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected! > > arch/ia64/Kconfig:128: choice <choice> contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM > > arch/ia64/Kconfig:202: symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM > > > > IA64_HP_SIM is both a choice and is selected. > > > > I did allyesconfig and disabled PCI afterwards to find all the issues > > on this patchset. > > Are you saying there's a newer series that fixes this issue for both > allyesconfig and allmodconfig? > > if yes, then we're good. No, I haven't fixed ia64 kconfig issue. That's somebody else's job. I used allyesconfig to find out all compilation issues on x86 arch to come up with this patchset. > > > > >> 2. there are different patterns to express the dependency on PCI e.g. > >> > >> config MMC_SDHCI_ACPI > >> tristate "SDHCI support for ACPI enumerated SDHCI controllers" > >> depends on MMC_SDHCI && ACPI > >> - select IOSF_MBI if X86 > >> + select IOSF_MBI if (X86 && PCI) > >> > >> but > >> > >> config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI > >> tristate "ACPI HiFi2 (Baytrail, Cherrytrail) Platforms" > >> default ACPI > >> - depends on X86 && ACPI > >> + depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI > >> select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI > >> select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM > >> select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH > >> > > I matched depends line to > > > > depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI > > > > for MMC_SDHCI_ACPI per feedback from Rafael on V5. This should resolve > > the inconsistency. > ok, I didn't see the delta > > > > > >> IOSF is only needed for Baytrail-CR detection, and the code will compile > >> fine without it, so maybe it'd be a better model if you used the > >> following diff? > >> > >> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig > >> index 2fd1b61e8331..68af0ea5c96c 100644 > >> --- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig > >> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig > >> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI > >> select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI > >> select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM > >> select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH > >> - select IOSF_MBI > >> + select IOSF_MBI if PCI > >> > >> 3. All the Intel machine drivers depend on X86_INTEL_LPSS which depends > >> on PCI. But for Baytrail/Haswell/Broadwell we have only a dependency on > >> ACPI, so we expose drivers that can be selected but fail on probe since > >> there are no machine drivers. I am not sure if we want to be strict and > >> only expose meaningful configurations, or allow for more compilations > >> tests and corner cases? > > Hopefully, v5 resolves this too with > > > > depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI > > > > Let me know otherwise. > > it doesn't but that's not a good enough reason to lay on the tracks. > I'll follow-up with a cleanup for the Intel audio parts when this series > is merged. The PCI dependency could be moved to the top-level since it's > pretty much required for all platforms except for compilation tests, and > there are multiple dependencies that repeated for no good reason, so FWIW > > Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
