On 12/23/18 5:25 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Code does unconditional select for IOSF_MBI. IOSF_MBI driver depends on
CONFIG_PCI set but this is not specified anywhere.
Can you please share the .config that exposes this problem? This hasn't
changed in a long time and I wonder why this pops up now. You have
similar cases elsewhere, e.g. arch/x86/Kconfig
config X86_INTEL_LPSS
bool "Intel Low Power Subsystem Support"
depends on X86 && ACPI
select COMMON_CLK
select PINCTRL
select IOSF_MBI
or for the MMC.
config MMC_SDHCI_ACPI
tristate "SDHCI support for ACPI enumerated SDHCI controllers"
depends on MMC_SDHCI && ACPI
select IOSF_MBI if X86
The use of IOSF_MBI is only for the Baytrail-CR detection and there are
already in-flight patches to change the code and move it to a helper.
My understanding is that for compilation you only need CONFIG_x86 since
there are fall-back routines available in iosf_mbi.h
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
index 2fd1b61e8331..b0764b2fe001 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_PCI
config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI
tristate "ACPI HiFi2 (Baytrail, Cherrytrail) Platforms"
default ACPI
- depends on X86 && ACPI
+ depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI
select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM
select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
