On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Tc, Jenny wrote: > The driver already exposes another parameter (wakeup-delay-ms) using device tree. > Enabling ACPI device enumeration provides a way to pass existing parameter > and also cover the new parameter(modeswitch_delay_ms) introduced in this patch set. > Isn't it good to adopt ACPI enumeration if the driver has multiple parameters to handle? If you want to adopt device tree bindings in ACPI systems there is already the _DSD based mapping for this. However please be aware that ACPI and DT systems have radically different approaches in a number of areas, including describing sound cards, and trying to combine the two in the same system might lead to disappointment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
