On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:15:42 +0200,
Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently the return from pnp_port_start is being checked for validity
> by checking if it is greater or equal to zero, however, the return
> is unsigned and hence this check is always true. An 0 return from
> pnp_port_start is actually an error, so fix the check by checking
> for validity when it is non-zero.
I guess you're confused between mpu_port[] and mpu_irq[]?
The check "mpu_irq[] >= 0" here is to see the module parameter value
from user.
thanks,
Takashi
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468334 ("Unsigned compared to 0")
>
> Fixes: a9824c868a2c ("[ALSA] Add CS4232 PnP BIOS support")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c b/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c
> index 70559e59d18f..2211c39d2c18 100644
> --- a/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c
> +++ b/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int snd_cs423x_pnp_init_mpu(int dev, struct pnp_dev *pdev)
> mpu_irq[dev] = SNDRV_AUTO_IRQ;
> } else {
> mpu_port[dev] = pnp_port_start(pdev, 0);
> - if (mpu_irq[dev] >= 0 &&
> + if (!mpu_irq[dev] &&
> pnp_irq_valid(pdev, 0) && pnp_irq(pdev, 0) >= 0) {
> mpu_irq[dev] = pnp_irq(pdev, 0);
> } else {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
