On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 17:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Should this be integrated into the Linux trace event mechanism rather > > than open coded? It would at least be nice to not call this a trace > > event buffer - when I initially read this I was expecting it to be for > > the standard Linux stuff which obviously it isn't. > Your right, I'll rename. The eventual aim is to make it more like Linux trace > but we are constrained somewhat as some DSPs only 96kB or instruction RAM, hence > it's a simple and raw trace infrastructure. I was thinking the code could read it like it's doing now and then just have a trace event to dump it into the core trace infrastructure as it reads things in.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
