In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c b/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c
index 46c292b..71776bf 100644
--- a/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c
+++ b/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ irqreturn_t snd_mixart_threaded_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
dev_err(&mgr->pci->dev,
"canceled notification %x !\n", msg);
}
- /* no break, continue ! */
+ /* fall through */
case MSG_TYPE_ANSWER:
/* answer or notification to a message we are waiting for*/
mutex_lock(&mgr->msg_lock);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
