Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: add option to control HDAudio + DSP usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/31/18 3:48 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 01:05:54 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

Add two options to explicitly enable HDAudio + DSP usage and force its
use

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  sound/soc/intel/Kconfig       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c |  7 ++++++-
  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
index 0caa1f4eb94d..93c3693cdf13 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
@@ -117,6 +117,25 @@ config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE
  	  GeminiLake or CannonLake platform with the DSP enabled in the BIOS
  	  then enable this option by saying Y or m.
+config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDA_DSP
+	bool "Enable HDAudio Codec + DSP support"
+	depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE
+	help
+	  If you have a Intel Skylake+ platform with the DSP enabled in
+	  the BIOS and an HDAudio codec, then enable this option by saying Y
+	  This option will only have an effect if there are no ACPI-enumerated
+	  audio devices (I2C, SoundWire).

IMO, the change needed for this config should be folded into the patch
4 "ASoC: Intel: Skylake: use HDAudio if ACPI enumeration fails").

Yes, agreed.


+config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_FORCE_HDA_DSP
+	bool "Force HDAudio Codec + DSP support"
+	depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDA_DSP
+	help
+	  If you have a Intel Skylake+ platform with the DSP enabled in
+	  the BIOS and an HDAudio codec, then enable this option by saying Y
+	  This option will ignore information from the BIOS and force the use
+	  of the HDaudio codec, if present.
+	  This is a debug option not recommended for distros.

... and this one is better to be a module option.
Distros tend to enable all possible options, and this may be set
unnecessarily.  If any, this kconfig should be only toggling the
default option value.

Sorry, I don't get this one. this wouldn't change anything between built-in or module, it's just a yes/no answer to ignore ACPI stuff. the default is also no and there is a clear statement not to include it except for debug. We have a similar option for SOF to bypass all ACPI information and go straight to 'nocodec' mode.


Just another nitpicking:

@@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ static struct skl_ssp_clk skl_ssp_clks[] = {
  						{.name = "ssp5_sclkfs"},
  };
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDA_DSP)
  static struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *skl_find_hda_machine(struct skl *skl,
  					struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *machines)
  {
@@ -492,6 +493,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *skl_find_hda_machine(struct skl *skl,
return mach;
  }
+#endif

Defining a dumb skl_find_hda_machine() returning NULL as #else would
reduce one more ifdef.  Also, CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDA_DSP is
a bool, so it can be a simple ifdef without IS_ENABLED().

#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDA_DSP
static struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *skl_find_hda_machine(struct skl *skl,
  					struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *machines)
{
	....
}
#else
static struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *skl_find_hda_machine(struct skl *skl,
  					struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *machines)
{
	return NULL;
}
#endif

yes, thanks for the suggestion.

	

thanks,

Takashi


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux