On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:39:03AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > The commit adding the duty-cycle feature in CCF is directly based on v4.18-rc1 > Do you plan on pulling this in your branch ? or wait for dependency to be sorted > out during the merge window maybe ? I'd like to but I'd rather have an explicit ack from the clock maintainers that that's OK and ideally a signed tag. Though it's taken so long that at this point it's not going to be much worse than just hoping it gets sorted out in mainline given the lack of branches, it's not affecting common platforms.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
