Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the audio component binding more generic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/19/18 1:56 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:05:45 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

On 7/19/18 12:50 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:54:35 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:



On 07/17/2018 04:26 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hi,

this is a preliminiary patch set to convert the existing i915 /
HD-audio component binding to be applicable to other drivers like
radeon / amdgpu.  This patchset itself doesn't change the
functionality but only renames and split to a new drm_audio_component
stuff from i915_audio_component.

The actual usage of the new API will follow once after this one gets
reviewed / accepted.  The whole patches (including this patchset) are
found in topic/hda-acomp branch of sound.git tree.

BTW, since the whole stuff is about the audio binding, I suppose these
will go through sound git tree.  Let me know if anyone has concerns.
No objections but a slight concern that this will conflict with the
HDAudio+DSP patches that I was about to resubmit on top of your
topic/hda-core-intel branch. the two series touch the same files so
it'd be a miracle if there is no issue.
How do you want to deal with this?

Does it conflict severely?  If it's trivial, it can be resolved at
merge time, too.  The changes in my patchset are fairly trivial, so it
shouldn't be too hard.

I was able to make things work by taking your topic/hda-core-intel,
merge it on Mark's for-next, then add my additional changes and these
DRM changes. The last two can be done in any order. But I am getting
some conflicts if I try to apply these DRM changes first, not sure why
git is complaining though, the changes look trivial enough.
So yes it looks possible to deal with the two series in parallel, will
send my update later today.

OK, since my changes are relatively trivial to deal with, I merge the
changes to for-next branch now.

If your patches can be respinned, maybe it's easier to be rebased on
top of these merges.

I was planning to resend them tomorrow after internal reviews (mostly changes in the detection/enablement of the HDaudio+DSP case). If you want to take a look in the mean time the patches are here: https://github.com/plbossart/sound/commits/upstream/hda2

I can rebase them as needed, no big deal.
Thanks
-Pierre


Mark, could you merge topic/drm_audio_component branch into yours, if
Pierre's patchset won't go in immediately?  It's an immutable branch,
including already topic/hda-core-intel in itself.


thanks,

Takashi


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux