On 11-07-18, 09:43, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > This patch aims at add achieving dynamic behaviour of audio card when > the dependent components disappear and reappear. > > With this patch the card is removed if any of the dependent component > is removed and card is added back if the dependent component comes back. > All this is done using component framework and matching based on > component name. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks fine mostly, some nitpicks below: > --- > > During discussion regarding card re-binding when components unregister > and register back at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/9/785 it was suggested > that component framework can be added into core to provide this feature. > > With this new changes the card will re-bind once the dependent component > re-registers after unregistering. This works based on the match done > from component name using component framework. > > I have tested this patch with qdsp start-stop usecase for more than 10000 > times in loop on Qcom platforms. > > I will send qdsp side cleanup patches once I get some feedback on this patch. > > > include/sound/soc.h | 5 ++++ > sound/soc/soc-core.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h > index 870ba6b64817..b94149d29c0d 100644 > --- a/include/sound/soc.h > +++ b/include/sound/soc.h > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/component.h> > #include <linux/regmap.h> > #include <linux/log2.h> > #include <sound/core.h> > @@ -1088,6 +1089,10 @@ struct snd_soc_card { > > struct work_struct deferred_resume_work; > > + /* component framework related */ > + bool components_added; > + struct component_match *match; > + > /* lists of probed devices belonging to this card */ > struct list_head component_dev_list; > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c > index 6d33634b934b..377ed8e67686 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c > @@ -279,11 +279,31 @@ static inline void snd_soc_debugfs_exit(void) > > #endif > > +static int snd_soc_card_comp_compare(struct device *dev, void *data) Why not make last arg as name and avoid void * > +{ > + struct snd_soc_component *component = NULL; > + struct snd_soc_component *t; why do you need two variables for this > + > + lockdep_assert_held(&client_mutex); > + list_for_each_entry(t, &component_list, list) { > + if (dev == t->dev) { > + component = t; you can skip this line and use t in below code. > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (component && !strcmp(component->name, data)) strncmp? -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
