Hi,
On May 28 2018 06:23, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The error for a -ve value in ret is redundant as all previous
assignments to ret have an associated -ve check and hence it
is impossible for ret to be less that zero at the point of the
check. Remove this redundant error check.
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1469407 ("Logically Dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/xen/xen_snd_front_evtchnl.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_evtchnl.c b/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_evtchnl.c
index d70a62e7f910..102d6e096cc8 100644
--- a/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_evtchnl.c
+++ b/sound/xen/xen_snd_front_evtchnl.c
@@ -351,8 +351,6 @@ int xen_snd_front_evtchnl_create_all(struct xen_snd_front_info *front_info,
}
}
}
- if (ret < 0)
- goto fail;
front_info->num_evt_pairs = num_streams;
return 0;
Yep. All branches for error path on the nested for loop have goto
statement, thus no need to check error outer the loop.
Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Takashi Sakamoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
