We should set BE symmetric constraint on FE substream. in case one BE is used by two FE1/FE2, the first BE runtime will use FE1's substream->runtime. hence the FE1's will be constrained by BE symmetry property. Though, second FE2 call dpcm_apply_symmetry, the be_substream->runtime == FE1's substream->runtime. The FE2's substream->runtime will not be constrained by BE's symmetry property. Signed-off-by: KaiChieh Chuang <kaichieh.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 481604a..1ef7514 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1779,14 +1779,15 @@ static int dpcm_apply_symmetry(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream, /* Symmetry only applies if we've got an active stream. */ if (rtd->cpu_dai->active) { - err = soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(be_substream, rtd->cpu_dai); + err = soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(fe_substream, + rtd->cpu_dai); if (err < 0) return err; } for (i = 0; i < rtd->num_codecs; i++) { if (rtd->codec_dais[i]->active) { - err = soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(be_substream, + err = soc_pcm_apply_symmetry(fe_substream, rtd->codec_dais[i]); if (err < 0) return err; -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel