On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:07:11AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > On 18-05-17 18:08, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Please submit a followup patch which makes the entire comment a C++ one > > rather than mixing them in the same comment block, it makes things look > > more intentional. > I'm a bit confused. As documented by the > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst the license header should be a C++ > comment but for all block comments the 'normal' coding style should be > applied. I can seperate the license header and the comment to make it > more intentional. > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > /* > * Analog Devices SSM2305 Amplifier Driver > * > * Copyright (C) 2018 Pengutronix, Marco Felsch <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > */ > Is that better? No, that still looks like a mess. Just make the whole thing a C++ comment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
