On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:22:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > flexible. Devices don't need to be able to do this independently, you > > can have a flexible external clock tree for example. > Thanks for clarifying this. So in this particular case we should use > snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list for SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE to enforce only > supported rates based on master clock, right? I'll rework this patch then. Yes, that's the ideal.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
