@Pierre-Louis > That looks acceptable to me, Xiuli can you test with with the matching change > in the SOF topology macros (we can keep the 'slave' in M4 files but expand to > 'codec_slave' in the .conf to avoid making this exception visible). I don't see any comments from Pan Xiuli in the whole mailing thread. Do we still wait for his feedback? @Mark >>> Should we warn on use of "master" since it's being deprecated here (and >>> might be confusing for users)? >> Maybe. OTOH, it looks fully backward-compatible, so far, so it's not that >> confusing yet. > Not a compatibility issue, yeah - more just that we've clearly already got people > confused so pushing people to the more explicit name might avoid further > issues down the line. Agree with that. I will add a warning and send it as a patch v2. @Takashi > Yep, please at the next time. (And, don't stick with an old thread, but refresh a > new thread.) Yes, I will do so. I want to do this clean, so let me clarify before I start: 1. I will start a new thread, with linux [patch v2] 2. I will send the [patch, alsa-lib v2] in-reply to that linux [patch v2] 3. I will add all currently involved people as CC Does it look correct? Best Regards, Kirill _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
