On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Richard Fitzgerald
<rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the actual problem you are trying to fix? The comment about
> { 0 } only clearing the first member is probably bogus, your actual
> problem is that it should have been { NULL } ?
Changing to { NULL } fixes the sparse warning, but that would be a
fragile fix because it relies on the order of the struct members.
If someday the struct changes in a way so that the first member is no
longer a pointer, then we will have issues again.
Using {} is more error prone.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
